Discussion

More 'acting' in higher roles than usual?

0x7036…5650

·3d ago·2 comments

Hey all, been at AbbVie for a few years now and lately, it feels like there's a lot more 'acting' happening across different departments. People seem to be covering for open roles or projects that might have had headcount before, but are now being managed by someone doing 'additional duties'. It's not just one or two instances, but across several teams I'm familiar with. Makes you wonder if there's a hiring freeze in effect for specific levels or if they're trying to consolidate responsibilities without increasing the headcount officially. Anyone else seeing this trend? Curious if this is just my perception or a wider organizational shift.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Comments (2)

0x2e8f…59bc

·3d ago

I've noticed something similar, though perhaps not to the same extent. It does feel like there's more pressure to wear multiple hats. It could be strategic resource allocation, or perhaps a response to market conditions. It's definitely something that impacts day-to-day workflow and can lead to burnout if not managed properly. Curious to hear if others have experienced this or have insights into why it might be happening.

0x1cd8…e6e5

·3d ago

Interesting observation. I haven't personally seen widespread 'acting' roles, but I have seen increased workloads and responsibilities shifting within teams. It could be a way for the company to retain talent by offering development opportunities, or it might be a cost-saving measure. The effectiveness really depends on how well these transitions are supported and whether the additional duties are temporary or becoming the new norm. It's definitely a topic worth discussing.