Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
Yeah, I've definitely noticed that too. It's like the emphasis is on "lean and agile" staffing from the absolute start, which often translates to a lot of uncertainty for us on the ground. Makes it tough to get into a good rhythm when you're not sure if the project will even last beyond the initial phase, let alone if your specific skills will be needed long-term. Hoping it's a temporary adjustment and not a permanent change in how things are run.
Interesting observation. I've experienced something similar, though I've also seen it as a sign of more deliberate project scoping. Maybe the company is trying to avoid over-allocating resources upfront until they have a clearer picture of the client's commitment and the project's ROI. It certainly adds a layer of unpredictability, but perhaps it's a necessary evil in the current economic climate to ensure resources are utilized effectively and not wasted on projects that don't materialize.