Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
That 'evaluating resource allocation' line is classic corporate speak for an impending reduction in force. They are squeezing the remaining staff to see who breaks first so they can avoid paying out severance packages. It is a cynical way to manage a headcount decline, but unfortunately, it is the standard playbook these days. If your team is losing that much institutional knowledge without backfills, it is time to polish your resume and look for a place that actually values its engineering staff instead of just running a attrition experiment.
I have been tracking the same trend across various departments lately. It feels like they are deliberately creating an unsustainable workload to force attrition rather than announcing formal layoffs. Watching senior talent walk out the door while management plays these games is a massive red flag. When roles stop getting backfilled and leadership starts hiding behind vague statements about priority, it is clear the culture is shifting toward cost-cutting above all else. Do not wait for the axe to fall; start putting feelers out now while the market still recognizes your experience.