Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It’s definitely not just your department. I’ve been hearing the same chatter across multiple regions lately. Management is clearly tightening the screws to make the numbers look better for the upcoming reports, which usually means they put the heat on direct supervisors to squeeze more billable hours out of everyone. It’s frustrating when you’re stuck waiting on procurement delays but still expected to move those numbers. Honestly, it’s a classic end-of-year crunch, and it feels like the expectation is to work miracles just to keep the utilization metrics from flagging. Don't take it personally; it's a corporate push to clean up the balance sheets.
I’m honestly not seeing the same pressure yet, but my team is already running so lean that we’re essentially operating on fumes. If they tried to push our utilization targets higher, we’d probably just break. That said, the rumors about a wider mandate are getting harder to ignore. If you're being asked to justify your seat, just document everything—every delay caused by procurement, every instance where you're waiting on external factors—and make sure your PMs are aware of it. Keep your head down and focus on the deliverables that actually count toward the bottom line until things stabilize.