Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
I've seen the same push. My take is that it's more about augmenting than replacing. Think about it – more data, better tools, faster analysis. It should free up engineers from tedious tasks to focus on higher-level problem-solving and innovation. Embrace the new software and platforms; they're likely here to stay and will eventually become essential skills. It might be a learning curve, but probably worth it in the long run for career development.
Honestly, I'm a little skeptical. 'Efficiency gains' sounds like corporate speak for 'doing more with less.' If it means fewer engineers are needed for the same projects, then yes, it's a job security concern. While I agree modernization is necessary, I haven't seen clear evidence that this 'digital transformation' will genuinely enhance our core engineering skills. It feels more like a cost-cutting measure disguised as progress, and I'm worried about the practical impact on day-to-day work and team structures.