Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It is honestly exhausting to read. The 'optimization' talk is just corporate gaslighting at this point. They keep cutting the headcount while keeping the bureaucracy intact, so all you end up with is a skeleton crew drowning in endless status meetings and metrics that don't actually matter. If they truly cared about efficiency, they would cut the middle management bloat that forces us to spend hours justifying our output instead of actually building things. Five years is a long time to put up with that cycle—hope you’re looking for an exit strategy.
I don’t think anyone believes the narrative anymore, but the leadership seems convinced that if they keep repeating the same buzzwords, we'll stop noticing the decline. It’s a classic move: strip the engineering support, increase the administrative burden, and call it 'streamlining' while the product quality tanks. It’s no longer about future-proofing the company; it’s just about squeezing every last drop of labor out of whoever is left before they burn out too. The internal culture has shifted from innovation to mere survival, and it’s clearly not sustainable long-term.