Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It’s definitely not just you. That 'efficiency' excuse is the oldest trick in the book to avoid the legal scrutiny that comes with larger layoffs. By slicing off small groups at different sites, they manage to fly under the radar of state regulators and keep everyone else paranoid enough to stay quiet. I’ve seen this exact cycle play out in two other departments over the last year. They want to avoid the bad PR of a mass WARN event at all costs while still hitting those aggressive quarterly margin targets. Watch your back, because the rolling cuts are likely just getting started.
Honestly, the writing has been on the wall for a while. Everyone keeps talking about 'operational synergies,' but we all know that’s just corporate speak for trimming the fat to pump up the share price before the next earnings call. They aren't interested in the people who actually build the products; they’re just looking at spreadsheets and identifying redundant headcount to satisfy the shareholders. Expect more of this throughout the year. It’s a classic squeeze, and unfortunately, being a high performer doesn't protect you when they decide to consolidate an entire site.