Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It’s the same story everywhere, but Arista has been feeling especially tight lately. When you're dealing with high-performance networking hardware, the cycle for R&D is naturally long-term. Forcing us to quantify the ROI of deep-level kernel work or architectural stability is like trying to measure the value of a foundation while the house is still being framed. The focus has shifted from building the best switches on the market to justifying every engineering hour on a spreadsheet, and it’s killing the creative autonomy we used to have.
Honestly, the push for constant ROI documentation feels like a symptom of the current market anxiety. I’ve seen this script play out before; leadership gets nervous and suddenly every task needs a revenue tag attached to it. While Arista’s core business remains strong, this micromanagement approach is a quick way to burnout the very people keeping the stack stable. We’re losing the ability to tackle the complex, invisible problems that keep the infrastructure running because we’re too busy writing status reports that nobody actually reads.