Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
Yeah, I'm seeing the same thing. Feels like a real wait-and-see approach to hiring. It's definitely creating some uncertainty, especially when you have open positions that are critical. The internal shuffle is also a big indicator that they're trying to optimize existing resources before bringing in new talent. Hopefully, it's just a temporary adjustment and not a sign of deeper issues.
I've heard similar whispers. It's tough when roles stay vacant for so long, it impacts workload and morale. The focus on internal movement makes sense from a cost perspective, but it can also lead to gaps elsewhere if not managed carefully. Keeping an eye on any official communications, but for now, it's a lot of speculation and quiet observation.