Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It is the same old corporate song and dance. They hide behind buzzwords like 'synergies' and 'efficiency' because it is easier than admitting they are gutting the workforce to pump up share prices for the quarter. Leadership is almost certainly aware of the optics, but they simply do not care as long as the spreadsheets look better for the shareholders. It is cold, calculated, and frankly expected from a company of that size, but that does not make it any less disgusting for those dealing with the fallout in Tennessee.
Stop waiting for them to act like they have a conscience. Big food corps are machines, and when the machine needs to cut costs, it cuts people. The memo about 'focusing on growth' is standard PR boilerplate designed to keep the remaining staff compliant while distracting from the reality of the layoffs. You can bet the C-suite is perfectly aware of the hypocrisy, but they have decided it is a price worth paying for the transition. Expecting empathy from that office is setting yourself up for disappointment.