Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
The cycle is exhausting to watch. Every time they talk about 'streamlining' or 'operational efficiency,' those of us in the trenches know exactly what it means for our teams. It isn't just about the numbers on the spreadsheet; it is the total loss of institutional knowledge that happens when you prune the staff this aggressively. You can’t expect the same level of service and safety while constantly cutting the workforce to satisfy short-term earnings goals. At this point, the morale is non-existent because nobody feels secure, and the workload just keeps piling up for those left behind.
It is brutal, but unfortunately, this is the playbook for modern utility management. They prioritize shareholder dividends over everything else, including the people who actually keep the lights on. Seeing over a hundred people get cut at once isn't just a corporate strategy—it’s a disruption to families and local communities. I’ve stopped looking for a logical reason behind the madness; it’s clearly just about making the balance sheet look pristine for the investors regardless of the operational cost. Expect more of the same until the next round of restructuring hits.