Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
I've been seeing something similar. It feels like the goalposts are constantly shifting. We're being asked to do more with less, and the justification always seems to be some buzzword about the market or internal jargon that doesn't translate into actionable support. It's frustrating when you're trying to genuinely improve performance but the targets feel detached from reality. Makes you wonder if the metrics themselves are being manipulated to look better on paper, rather than reflecting actual productivity gains.**
That's a good point. It's not just about hitting numbers, it's about understanding *why* those numbers are set where they are. If the expectations are suddenly much higher without any corresponding changes in tools, training, or support, it breeds cynicism. It’s hard to stay motivated when you feel like you’re being set up to fail or that the targets are more about optics than genuine business improvement. I'd love to see more transparency on how these goals are determined and what resources are actually being allocated to help us achieve them.**