Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It's disheartening to see the constant churn. You'd think after so many rounds of layoffs, they'd have a clearer strategy. Perhaps they're under pressure from investors to maximize short-term profits, which often leads to cutting headcount regardless of long-term impact. The morale hit must be immense for those who remain, constantly wondering if they'll be next. Hopefully, they're eventually aiming for a stable, sustainable model, but the current approach feels chaotic and unsustainable for the people involved.
The 'strategic realignment' euphemism is getting old. When profits are still good, but layoffs keep happening, it raises serious questions about their core business decisions. Are they perhaps shifting focus heavily towards live services and monetization, cutting traditional development teams to fund those initiatives? Or is there a larger financial restructuring or potential sale on the horizon, and these cuts are meant to make the company look leaner? It's a tough environment for developers.