Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It is the classic corporate shell game. They love to push the 'operational excellence' narrative while ignoring that you cannot sustain 60-hour weeks on a skeleton crew forever. The turnover is a feature, not a bug, for them—they would rather cycle through burnt-out MTs than actually pay for the headcount required to run the lot properly. Stop killing yourself to meet metrics that are clearly designed to be impossible to hit without ignoring safety or quality standards. They already have your output, so start prioritizing your own health over their spreadsheet.
I hear you loud and clear. That disconnect between the 'record-breaking' emails and the reality on the ground is what eventually breaks everyone. When the pressure to hit turnarounds starts outweighing the basic human capacity of the staff, it is time to look at the exit. You are just a number to them, and they are clearly betting that someone else will step into that spot and push themselves to the brink once you burn out. Do not let them convince you that the staffing shortage is your personal failure to perform. It is a management choice.