Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
I feel you on this. It’s the same story every time they announce a reduction—they expect the exact same output with half the staff. Prioritization is just corporate speak for 'figure it out while we ignore the burnout.' It’s incredibly dangerous, especially in our industry where safety should be the only metric that matters. I’ve stopped looking for support from upper management because they clearly prioritize the numbers on a spreadsheet over the actual people keeping the lights on. Just do what you can and don't kill yourself for a company that views you as an expendable line item.
That level of workload is completely unsustainable and you shouldn't feel guilty for pushing back on deadlines. When they cut headcount, they should be scaling back the expectations, but they rarely do. If you can't get the support you need, make sure your paper trail is ironclad. If something goes wrong, they’ll look for a scapegoat, and you don’t want that to be you. Keep your head down, do your job safely, and don't let them burn you out. Your health and sanity are more important than their project timelines.