Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
I couldn’t agree more. It’s the classic corporate trap of cutting the backbone of the company to make the quarterly numbers look pretty for shareholders. They act like 'streamlining' is a visionary strategy, but it’s really just burnout by design. When you lose the institutional knowledge that leaves with every departure, you aren't saving money; you're just paying for the inevitable mistakes and delays that follow. You can't run a complex operation on a skeleton crew indefinitely without something eventually snapping.
You're not alone in feeling that way. It’s incredibly draining to watch management chase efficiency metrics while the actual work suffers. It’s almost laughable how they emphasize 'synergy' and 'optimization' while those of us on the ground are drowning in twice the workload. At this point, the focus has shifted entirely from actual operational excellence to just making the spreadsheet look slightly better for the next investor call. Loyalty is a two-way street, and it’s clear which direction they’ve decided to turn.