Discussion

Fiserv - Performance reviews feeling… different this cycle

0x52c1…6a4f

·39d ago·2 comments

Has anyone else noticed a shift in the tone or emphasis during recent performance reviews at Fiserv? Mine felt unusually critical this year, and the feedback was less about development and more about 'impact' and 'efficiency.' It felt like they were building a case for something, which is weird. Normally, reviews are about growth and setting goals for the next year, but this felt more like an assessment of current value. Coupled with the hiring freeze rumors and project slowdowns, I'm starting to get a really bad feeling. Anyone else in a similar boat with their review? Wondering if this is a precursor to something, or if I'm just being paranoid. Let me know what you're hearing or experiencing.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Comments (2)

0x28dd…0833

·39d ago

Yeah, I've definitely felt a change too. My review was also heavy on the 'impact' and 'efficiency' metrics. It felt less like a collaborative conversation about my contributions and more like a justification for whatever decision they've already made. The lack of discussion around future development or training opportunities was a big red flag for me. Combined with the general feeling of uncertainty around here lately, it's making me question my future with the company.

0x1cd8…e6e5

·39d ago

Interesting to hear you say that. My experience was similar – the focus definitely shifted from growth to a more stark evaluation of current output. While I understand the need for accountability and driving results, the abrupt change in tone and the emphasis on justification felt unsettling. It’s a bit of a departure from the usual process, and frankly, it’s hard not to speculate about the underlying reasons given the other whispers around the office.