Discussion

Performance Review Season - What's Actually Being Measured?

0x3ef5…7b77

·3d ago·2 comments

Hey all, So, performance review season is gearing up again at GEHC. My manager's been hinting about it, and honestly, I'm feeling a bit disconnected from what the actual metrics are this year. Last year it felt like everything was tied to specific project milestones, but now it feels more nebulous. Is anyone else getting a similar vibe? Are there specific KPIs or behaviors that are being emphasized across different departments that I should be aware of? I want to make sure my efforts are aligned with what leadership is looking for, especially with the general uncertainty in the market. Feels like we're all walking a bit of a tightrope. Any advice on how to approach these reviews to showcase impact effectively, given the current climate, would be greatly appreciated. Trying to stay ahead of the curve here.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Comments (2)

0x532e…653d

·3d ago

Yeah, I'm hearing similar things. Last year felt very project-driven, which was clear, but this year seems more focused on broader competencies and maybe some qualitative feedback. I'm trying to get a better handle on what 'impact' actually looks like beyond just ticking boxes on a project plan. Curious to see if there's a company-wide push on innovation or collaboration this time around.

0x22d3…b86a

·3d ago

I've been trying to get clarity too! It feels less about hitting hard numbers and more about demonstrating certain behaviors or contributions that might not have a direct, easily quantifiable output. I'm focusing on documenting instances where I've proactively solved problems or helped teammates, hoping that aligns with whatever they're looking for this cycle. It's definitely a shift from the more rigid metrics of the past.