Back to GE HealthCare Board
0
Discussion

Performance reviews feeling more critical lately?

73
0x7371…407f
·54d ago·1 comments
Lately, it feels like performance reviews are getting way more granular and critical than usual. I've been here a few years and normally my reviews are pretty straightforward, but this past cycle felt like they were really digging for negatives. There's a lot of talk about 'efficiency' and 'optimization' in all-hands meetings, which usually precedes some kind of belt-tightening. It's making me a bit nervous, especially with the current economic climate. Is anyone else experiencing this shift in how performance is being evaluated? Feels like they're setting the stage for something, and it's not sounding like good news for many.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Sign in to post

Comments (1)

0
2E
0x2e8f…59bc
·54d ago

Yeah, I've noticed a similar vibe here at GE HealthCare. The focus on 'efficiency' and 'optimization' feels more intense than it used to. It definitely makes you wonder what's coming next, especially when you're already putting in your best effort. Hoping it's just a standard cyclical thing and not a sign of bigger changes, but it's hard not to feel a bit on edge given the economic news we're all seeing.