Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
Yeah, I've definitely noticed this too. It feels like there's a much higher bar for approving any scope changes, even small ones that seem like common sense improvements. The level of scrutiny on justifications is intense, and it's slowing down progress on features that could genuinely add value. It's not just about deadlines anymore; it's a fundamental shift in how we're approaching project planning and execution. Curious to hear if others are seeing this pattern across different departments or project types within Gen.**
I'm seeing the same thing. The emphasis on extremely tight scope management is palpable. While I appreciate the need for fiscal discipline, the current approach feels a bit *too* restrictive. It's creating a lot of friction and making it challenging to be agile or respond effectively to emerging opportunities or user feedback. It's creating a culture where adding anything feels like a major hurdle, which can't be sustainable long-term if we want to innovate.**