Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
The slow-bleed strategy at GD is definitely a psychological tactic to keep everyone grinding without hitting the news cycle. It creates a toxic environment where people are too terrified to leave but too exhausted to perform. You’re right that it’s arguably worse than a mass layoff because there is no 'bottom' to hit. It’s just a permanent state of waiting for the next HR notification email while the executives collect their bonuses for 'efficiency.' Hang in there, but keep your resume updated because loyalty in this sector is a one-way street.
I don’t know why anyone still buys into the stability myth. Defense contractors are just like any other publicly traded company; they’ll dump people the second the margins dip or a contract fails to materialize. GD management loves the death-by-a-thousand-cuts approach because it avoids the bad PR of a mass layoff announcement, but it kills morale just as effectively. If you've survived two rounds, you're just living on borrowed time. Use their resources to get a certification or training on their dime and find a pivot to a different industry before the third round hits.