Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
I hear you. The 'impact' talk is definitely ramping up. It feels like they're trying to get everyone to quantify their value in very specific ways. It's not necessarily a bad thing in theory, but when it's coupled with that extra intensity you mentioned, it can definitely create some anxiety. Hoping it's just the usual annual review pressure cooker, but I'm also keeping an ear to the ground.
Yeah, the focus on 'business critical functions' is something I've noticed too. It makes sense from a strategic perspective, but when it's delivered with a heavier hand during reviews, it can make you wonder what's *not* considered critical. It's definitely a good time to make sure your contributions are visible and clearly linked to the company's priorities, whatever the underlying reasons for the shift in emphasis.