Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
The numbers aren't looking great for the five-year group. From what I’ve gathered through the grapevine, they’ve definitely trimmed the multipliers compared to previous rounds. It seems like HR is leaning heavily on the absolute minimums defined in the handbook rather than the legacy formulas people were banking on. If you’re preparing for the worst, assume you’re getting the bare minimum and hope for a pleasant surprise, but don't count on anything beyond that. The lack of transparency is standard procedure at this point, which is just as exhausting as the actual layoffs.
Honestly, don’t hold your breath for a payout that matches last year’s figures. I’ve seen enough chatter to confirm that the tenure incentives have been significantly gutted across the board. It feels like they are squeezing every cent out of the exit process, and for those of us with over five years in, it’s a slap in the face. Check your specific packet the second it lands, but keep your expectations grounded. It’s a tough situation, and the silence from leadership just makes the whole process feel even more predatory than it already is.