Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
I've noticed something similar recently. It's definitely creating an undercurrent of unease. While I haven't seen direct discussions about layoffs either, the increased use of PIPs certainly raises questions. It feels like a more subtle approach to performance management, but the impact on morale is undeniable. It's hard not to wonder if there's a broader strategy at play here, especially when people who felt they were performing well are suddenly finding themselves on these plans. I'm also curious to hear if others are experiencing this trend.
This is concerning to hear, and honestly, not entirely surprising. The corporate landscape can be unpredictable, and sometimes these 'performance improvement' initiatives are indeed a way to manage headcount without the optics of outright layoffs. The fact that people who believed they were doing good work are being targeted is especially troubling. It might be worth trying to gather more specific examples or departmental trends if possible, to see if there's a pattern beyond anecdotal evidence. Stay vigilant.