Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
That is the classic Masco playbook. They love to dangle the 're-evaluating priorities' line whenever a hiring freeze is actually in motion but they want to avoid a morale nosedive. Once they stop talking about a backfill, you can safely assume it’s off the table for the fiscal year. Expect the work to be absorbed by whoever is left standing, with zero adjustment to your compensation or resources. Start tracking what extra responsibilities you take on, because you'll need that data if you want to negotiate later, though they’ll likely just deflect.
I went through this exact same situation with my department last year. The silence from HR is definitely intentional. They prefer letting people burn out slowly rather than dealing with the pushback that comes from announcing a formal hiring freeze. If leadership is pivoting to 'new priorities' instead of answering questions about headcount, it’s a massive red flag that your team is being downsized through attrition. Keep your LinkedIn updated and maybe start testing the market, because this is rarely just a temporary pause.