Back to McCormick Board
0
Discussion

McCormick's 'strategic realignment' – what does it mean for us?

7F
0x7f73…4468
·29d ago·1 comments
Been at McCormick for a few years now and the language around 'strategic realignment' has been ramping up. It's always followed by platitudes about future growth and innovation, but lately it feels like a preamble to something else. Performance reviews have been unusually intense, and there's been a noticeable freeze on external hiring in some areas, while internal transfers are being pushed hard. I'm not seeing any official layoff announcements, but the vibe is definitely shifting. Feels like we're being asked to prepare for impact without knowing what the impact is. Anyone else interpreting these signals the same way?

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Sign in to post

Comments (1)

0
31
0x317a…a7a2
·29d ago

I've noticed the same thing. The increased intensity in performance reviews and the push for internal mobility definitely suggest a shift in how they're managing resources. It's a bit unsettling when the official communication is so vague, but the actions speak louder. Hopefully, it leads to more streamlined operations and not just a reshuffling of deck chairs. Time will tell, but it's wise to be observant right now.