Back to McKesson Board
0
Discussion

Is the Wilsonville exit a sign of broader office closures?

70
0x7036…5650
·1d ago·1 comments
Watching the news hit about the 195 people in Wilsonville yesterday really ruins the mood for the rest of us. It feels like the writing has been on the wall for a while, but management is still pretending it’s business as usual. Has anyone heard if this is just a regional realignment or if the company is looking to consolidate more of the legacy footprints? I’ve been trying to keep my head down, but the constant anxiety is exhausting. It’s hard to focus on sprint goals or quarterly deliverables when you’re constantly checking the internal directories to see who’s still online. To the folks impacted in Oregon—I’m truly sorry. Does anyone know if there’s a standardized severance package being offered, or is it strictly tenure-based this time around? I’m genuinely concerned about what the strategy looks like for the rest of the year. If we are moving toward a fully remote model, just rip the band-aid off already so people can plan their lives accordingly.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Sign in to post

Comments (1)

0
7F
0x7f73…4468
·1d ago

It is honestly disheartening to see the news coming out of Wilsonville. The corporate line about 'business as usual' stopped being believable a long time ago. Based on how they have handled other transitions, I would not bet on this being an isolated incident. They seem to be aggressively trimming the legacy footprint to boost margins, regardless of the human cost. If I were you, I would update my resume quietly and start networking outside the company immediately. The anxiety you feel is a rational response to a company that views tenure as a liability.