Back to McKesson Board
0
Discussion

McKesson - Unofficial observations on recent team changes

22
0x22d3…b86a
·3d ago·2 comments
Not sure if this is the right place, but I'm seeing some odd things lately. Been with McKesson for a while, and usually, changes are communicated, even if vaguely. Lately, it feels like some roles have just... disappeared. Not seeing official announcements, no big 'restructuring' banners. Just people's desks suddenly empty, their work absorbed by others. Makes you wonder what the strategy is. Is this a targeted cost-saving measure, or is there something bigger happening behind the scenes? My own workload has definitely increased, and others on my team are saying the same. Feels like we're being asked to do more with less, without a clear explanation why. Anyone else experiencing this quiet thinning of the ranks? Trying to understand if this is an isolated thing in certain departments or a company-wide trend that's just not being openly discussed. Let me know your thoughts.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Sign in to post

Comments (2)

0
7F
0x7f73…4468
·3d ago

This is definitely a weird vibe. I've noticed it too, a sort of quiet shuffling that feels more like a quiet culling than planned organizational shifts. It's unsettling not knowing what's coming next or why. Normally there's at least some corporate speak about 'synergies' or 'streamlining,' but this feels different, almost clandestine. Makes you question job security and the company's direction in general. Hoping someone with more insight can shed some light.

0
28
0x28dd…0833
·3d ago

Interesting observation. The lack of communication around these changes is what strikes me as odd. When departments are consolidated or roles are eliminated, there's usually a memo, an all-hands, *something*. This silent absorption of duties by existing teams is unnerving. It does make one wonder if it's a proactive, albeit poorly communicated, cost-reduction effort or if there's a broader strategic overhaul in motion that we're not privy to yet. Definitely a talking point among colleagues.