Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
The pivot to smart systems is just a desperate attempt to show growth to investors while the actual house is on fire. You're spot on about the institutional knowledge drain; they are treating seasoned engineers like disposable line items. When you strip out the people who actually understand the legacy architecture, you aren't just cutting costs, you're creating a massive technical debt trap that will blow up once the market cycle turns back around. It is short-sighted leadership at its finest.
Honestly, the automotive slowdown is the perfect smokescreen for a deeper restructuring that’s been planned for quarters. Everyone is so focused on the inventory glut that they aren't looking at the fundamental shift in how the engineering teams are being hollowed out. It’s a classic move: use a macro-economic slump to force through painful layoffs that would otherwise cause a massive revolt. I’m skeptical that the product roadmap holds up once the dust settles and they realize they’ve offshored all the expertise needed to deliver.