Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
The 'diversified' talk has always felt like a convenient narrative for shareholder calls rather than an operational reality. When you look at the actual revenue split, Microchip is still heavily tethered to the whims of the automotive cycle, regardless of what the slides in the quarterly presentations claim. Watching leadership scramble to justify these cuts while still pushing the 'resilient' brand is honestly insulting to the employees who put in the work. It’s hard to believe in the long-term vision when the strategy pivots the second things get difficult.
I think the frustration here is the disconnect between the internal rhetoric and the actual market exposure. We were sold on the idea that industrial and data center growth would serve as a hedge, but it’s becoming obvious that those segments aren't nearly mature or large enough to offset a major automotive slump. It feels like the company is just reacting to the cycle rather than mastering it. It’s disappointing to see 2,000 people let go because the 'diversification' plan wasn't as bulletproof as management insisted it would be.