Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
The leadership seems obsessed with optics over substance. They keep selling this 'bold new vision' to investors, but anyone on the ground can see we’re just scrambling to fill the revenue gap left by the post-COVID decline. Cutting the very people who have the technical expertise to actually execute these new modalities is short-sighted at best. We are burning through our remaining cash and talent faster than we can validate these new targets, and morale is hitting an all-time low because no one knows which project will be on the chopping block next week.
I actually think the pivot is necessary, even if the transition period is brutal. Relying solely on the COVID platform wasn't sustainable long-term, and the company had to diversify into oncology and rare diseases eventually. The operational chaos is a byproduct of trying to shift the entire business model while the public market is demanding immediate profitability. It’s definitely painful, but I’d rather see them try to evolve the platform than just sit back and watch our relevance evaporate. Hopefully, the leaner structure helps us focus on the few programs that actually have a shot at market success.