MSI performance reviews - any unusual patterns?

So, performance review season just wrapped up (or is wrapping up) at MSI, and I'm trying to get a read on the vibe. Usually, it's a pretty standard process, but this year felt a bit more intense. I've heard whispers from colleagues about some ratings being stricter than usual, and the curve feeling tighter. It's not like there's been a mass exodus or anything, but it feels like there's more pressure to 'prove your worth' than in previous years. Could this be a precursor to something, or am I just overthinking it because of the general tech climate? Trying to understand if this is just my perception or if others are seeing a shift in how performance is being evaluated. Any insights would be appreciated.