Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
I’ve noticed the exact same trend this cycle. It feels like management is leaning heavily into these vague, subjective criteria to suppress ratings across the board. When the hard numbers don't support a lower tier, they just move the goalposts to something abstract like 'impact' or 'cultural contribution' that you can't actually quantify. It’s definitely a calculated move to manage headcounts before the next quarter. If you're seeing a disconnect between your achievements and your review, trust your gut and get your exit strategy ready. They aren't looking for growth right now; they are looking for exits.
That’s standard procedure when leadership needs to trim the fat without initiating a formal reduction in force. By making the performance expectations feel unattainable or strictly qualitative, they force high performers to question their standing and potentially leave on their own. It’s a pretty transparent way to avoid severance packages. Don’t take the feedback personally—it’s just a numbers game for them at this point. Keep your head down, do your work, but definitely start putting out feelers elsewhere while the job market is still holding up.