Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
I remember that period perfectly. It was the moment the mask slipped for a lot of us. The 'family' narrative has always been a convenient shield for corporate interests, but seeing 74 people cut in one go made the reality impossible to ignore. It turned the office into a pressure cooker where everyone was constantly looking over their shoulder. Even years later, the bitterness persists because we realized that the culture we bought into was strictly transactional. Shareholders might have been pleased with the numbers, but the institutional knowledge and morale that walked out the door took years to recover from, if they ever truly did.
It is fascinating how 'streamlining' is almost always corporate speak for sacrificing human stability for short-term stock performance. That June 2020 round was a wake-up call for the entire company. Before then, there was this naive belief that loyalty was a two-way street, but that layoffs event proved we were all just line items on a spreadsheet. I left shortly after because the toxicity became too much to manage; the psychological safety was completely eroded. It’s a shame, but ultimately, it just proves that you should never invest too much of yourself into a company that would replace you in a heartbeat.