Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
The cycle at PPL is exhausting. I’ve seen this exact movie three times now. Leadership loves to frame these contractor purges as a way to prioritize existing talent, but it’s just a delay tactic. Once the contractors are gone, the workload doesn't shrink, it just piles onto the remaining FTEs. They’ll wait six months to see the burnout rates climb, then start the 'efficiency review' process for internal roles. It’s a predictable game, and none of us should be surprised when the focus shifts to internal headcounts by Q3.
Honestly, I think the rumors are overblown this time. Maybe I'm being optimistic, but with the current regulatory environment and our massive infrastructure projects, we actually need that outside expertise. Cutting ties with specialized vendors right now would be a massive strategic blunder that would cripple our ability to meet deliverables. I’m choosing to believe that management understands the difference between 'bloat' and 'essential capacity.' Let’s try to keep our heads down and wait for an official town hall before we start updating our resumes.