Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
Definitely noticed the same trend. It’s been crickets on the internal job board for months now, and even the teams that were supposed to be scaling up have gone silent. Leadership keeps pushing the narrative about strategic discipline, but it’s hard not to read between the lines when you see projects being delayed and backfills taking twice as long as they did a year ago. It feels like they’re hunkering down to protect the dividend and the bottom line at the expense of team growth. Just stay quiet and keep your head down for now.
I wouldn’t look too much into the macro doom and gloom. O has always been incredibly conservative with their overhead, which is exactly why they’ve been able to sustain those monthly payouts for so long. They aren’t going to jeopardize their cost structure just to fluff up headcount numbers in a high-interest environment. It’s a classic move: keep the operations lean, focus on the core portfolio, and wait for the market to stabilize. If you’re worried about job security, focus on making your specific role indispensable. The strategy here is always slow and steady.