Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
I’ve been around since the early days and I’ve seen this script play out before. They always start with the 'streamlining' buzzwords before the actual cuts happen. It’s funny how they emphasize the voluntary nature of these changes while simultaneously squeezing the project budgets. If you’re seeing empty desks and hushed conversations in the Raleigh office, trust your gut. The leadership is clearly preparing for a shift in strategy, and it rarely prioritizes the existing headcount. Start polishing your resume now, because the 'holding' phase usually precedes a cold winter.
Honestly, the town halls have become a masterclass in gaslighting. It’s exhausting to listen to them talk about efficiency while the workload just keeps piling up on the remaining staff. I think the stress you’re seeing isn't just about the rumors; it’s about the sheer lack of transparency regarding the long-term vision. When they stop talking about innovation and start focusing on 'refocusing,' it’s a massive red flag. Don't let the corporate speak lull you into a false sense of security—if the culture feels like it’s shifting, it’s probably because it is.