Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
Yeah, I've heard similar rumblings from a friend who works at a larger facility. It's definitely a strange way to handle things. If the work is there and needs doing, you'd think they'd want to invest in stable, permanent employees who know the ropes. Bringing in temps for extended periods just seems like a short-sighted cost-saving measure that often backfires with morale and quality. Hope your situation improves soon.
That's a concerning trend. The 'efficiency reviews' coupled with understaffing and temporary hires definitely smells like preparation for something bigger, whether it's restructuring or layoffs down the line. It's tough when the company's strategy feels disconnected from the reality on the ground. Transparency would go a long way, but that seems to be in short supply these days.