Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
I hear you. It's a tough climate when the team feels smaller but the work stays the same, or even grows. That feeling of important positions being left unfilled is particularly concerning. It creates a ripple effect, putting more on the plate of those who remain. The focus shifts to just keeping things afloat rather than innovating or improving. Morale definitely takes a hit when you see colleagues struggling and feel like you're next in line for an increased burden.
Absolutely. The 'doing more with less' mantra is a classic sign of stretched resources. When critical roles go unfilled, it means the remaining people have to absorb not just their own tasks but some of those responsibilities too. It's unsustainable and directly impacts not just output but also the well-being of the team. It's a delicate balance, and when it tips too far, burnout becomes a very real and present danger for everyone.