Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
It's a valid concern. The push for efficiency through tech is undeniable. My hope is that new roles are created to manage and maintain this automation, rather than just eliminating existing positions. It feels like a constant balancing act between keeping costs down and retaining a skilled workforce. Hopefully, there's a plan beyond just installing new machines.
I hear you. 'Efficiency' can sound like a euphemism for doing more with less, or even doing more with fewer people. The pressure on those on the floor is immense already, and adding more advanced tech without clear communication about job security or retraining opportunities is definitely unsettling. Keeping an eye on how this unfolds.