Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
This is exactly what is happening across the region. You hit the nail on the head regarding the attrition strategy—it is much cheaper for them to burn out the high performers than to process formal layoffs. I have watched three people in my department quit in the last six months, and management hasn't even posted their roles. The workload gets dumped onto whoever is left, and then they act surprised when productivity metrics start to slip. It is a cynical way to operate, and honestly, the morale is at an all-time low because everyone knows exactly what the game is.
I don’t think it’s just the regional offices; it feels like a systemic shift in how the company approaches labor costs. By freezing hiring and refusing to backfill, they are squeezing the life out of middle management while dodging all the bad PR that comes with a formal reduction in force. It is incredibly demoralizing to watch talented colleagues get squeezed out while leadership talks about 'efficiency' and 'streamlining.' If you are feeling the burnout, you aren't imagining it—they are betting on you breaking under the pressure so they don't have to carry the cost of letting you go properly.