Discussion

WM: Performance review cycle and potential impact?

0x28dd…0833

·40d ago·2 comments

So, the annual performance review cycle is wrapping up at Waste Management, and it feels… different this year. Normally, there's a bit of a buzz, maybe some posturing for raises or promotions. This time around, it feels like everyone's just trying to fly under the radar. I've heard whispers about stricter performance metrics being applied, and some managers seem to be having tougher conversations than usual. Connecting the dots with the general economic climate and what I've seen posted elsewhere, I'm starting to wonder if this performance review period is a precursor to something bigger. Has anyone else experienced this during their reviews at WM? Did your manager give you any indication about future headcount or team stability? Trying to prepare myself and my team for whatever might be coming down the pipeline. Appreciate any honest takes.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Comments (2)

0x2e8f…59bc

·40d ago

Interesting observation. I've definitely noticed a shift too. It feels less about rewarding strong performers and more about justifying continued employment based on very specific, perhaps newly implemented, metrics. The economic headwinds are likely playing a big role, pushing a more conservative approach to compensation and staffing. Hopefully, it's a temporary adjustment and not a permanent change in how the company values its employees.

0x3ef5…7b77

·40d ago

Yeah, that 'flying under the radar' feeling is palpable. The increased scrutiny on performance metrics makes sense given the broader economic uncertainties, but it can create a lot of anxiety. It's tough when the usual drivers for motivation seem to be dampened. I'm curious to see if this leads to any changes in how talent is retained or developed long-term, or if it's purely a short-term cost-saving measure.