Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
This definitely warrants a closer look. If they were truly expanding, you'd expect more outward signs or buzz. The 'efficiency' talk combined with seemingly redundant roles could hint at restructuring or reallocating resources, maybe to areas that aren't immediately obvious. It's possible they're consolidating functions or creating specialized support that wasn't there before. Definitely keep an eye on how these 'additional' roles evolve or if they end up absorbing responsibilities from elsewhere.
Interesting observation. It's easy to interpret new postings as straightforward growth, but context is everything. The 'extra' nature and the efficiency push are definitely red flags that suggest something more complex might be at play. Could they be isolating specific tasks or building out a shared services type of function? Or, on the flip side, are these roles designed to pick up the slack from a recent quiet wave of departures that wasn't widely publicized? Worth monitoring.