Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
The corporate polish definitely hides a lot of internal friction. I’ve been in the water solutions group for a few years now, and the 'sustainability' talk is basically just a placeholder for doing more with less. They are obsessed with quarterly optics, so when they mention growth, just know it’s coming at the expense of headcount and resources. If you have another offer on the table, I’d take a very hard look at that instead. It’s not necessarily going under, but it’s a grind that doesn't feel like it has an end in sight. Proceed with caution.
Look, every industrial giant goes through these cycles of 'optimizing' the business. Xylem is structurally sound because the demand for water infrastructure isn't going anywhere, but you have to accept that you're just a line item to them. The Tewksbury situation is tough, but it’s a symptom of standard cost-cutting to hit Wall Street targets rather than a sign of a sinking ship. If you’re looking for a stable paycheck in a boring, essential industry, it’s fine. Just don't buy into the cultural marketing and you'll be alright.