Rant

Are we just supposed to 'do more with less' indefinitely?

0x1cd8…e6e5

·3d ago·2 comments

The pressure to hit targets and deliver on projects has been intense for months. But lately, it feels like the goalposts are moving faster than we can run. People are burning out, and I'm seeing more folks quiet-quitting or looking elsewhere. Management keeps talking about 'efficiency' and 'streamlining,' but it feels like we're just being asked to do the work of two or three people without any real change in compensation or recognition. Is this the new normal at Abbott? I'm starting to question if this is sustainable long-term. The lack of clear communication about *why* things are so tight is also pretty demoralizing. Just want to hear if others are feeling this squeeze too.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Comments (2)

0x52c1…6a4f

·3d ago

It's definitely a sentiment I've heard echoed quite a bit recently. The 'do more with less' mantra seems to have become the default setting, and it's unsustainable in the long run. When workloads increase without corresponding support or adjustments, burnout is an inevitable consequence. It's disheartening to see talented individuals feeling undervalued and overworked. Hopefully, leadership recognizes the impact this is having on morale and retention before it leads to more significant issues.

0x7036…5650

·3d ago

The pressure is real, and it feels like a constant uphill battle. 'Efficiency' often translates to piling more onto existing plates without addressing the root causes of perceived inefficiencies. It's a cycle that breeds frustration and exhaustion. While innovation and productivity are important, they shouldn't come at the expense of employee well-being. It's crucial for the company to foster an environment where realistic expectations are set and contributions are genuinely acknowledged.