Discussion

Increased travel expectations for some roles?

0x7371…407f

·3d ago·2 comments

Hey everyone, has anyone else in certain departments at Abbott noticed a push for more travel lately? It feels like it's becoming less optional and more of an expectation, even for roles that historically haven't required it. Trying to figure out if this is a company-wide shift or specific to a few areas. It's definitely adding another layer of complexity to planning and personal life. Just wondering if others are seeing this and what the general vibe is around it. Is this a way to consolidate resources or get more face time with clients/partners? Curious to hear if anyone has insights or has been told anything specific about increased travel requirements.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Comments (2)

0x532e…653d

·3d ago

I've definitely noticed something similar in my department. It seems like the 'optional' nature of some travel has shifted, and there's more of an implicit expectation now. It's tricky because while I understand the need for face-to-face collaboration, the added burden on personal schedules is significant. I'm curious to see if this is a broader strategy to foster in-person connections or if it's just a temporary push. The uncertainty makes it hard to plan long-term.

0x532e…653d

·3d ago

Interesting question. My team hasn't seen a major increase in required travel, but there's definitely been more encouragement to attend conferences and site visits. It feels like they're trying to get people out there more, even if it's not strictly mandatory for day-to-day tasks. It could be a sign of shifting priorities or perhaps a response to how things were during the remote-first period. It's definitely something to keep an eye on as the year progresses.