Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
Yeah, I'm hearing similar things across different departments. The 'efficiency' talk is definitely code for 'do more with less,' and it's exhausting. It feels like a deliberate strategy to create a narrative of underperformance, which is a pretty cynical way to manage, if you ask me. The morale hit is real, and it's hard to stay motivated when you feel like you're swimming against a tide that's being intentionally pushed against you. Hang in there, hopefully, things shift.
Honestly, I'm not so sure it's a setup. Sometimes these goals *are* ambitious, and the 'efficiency' talk is just management trying to push us to innovate and find better ways to work. We've all seen projects slip, and maybe this is a way to shake things up. It's tough, for sure, but maybe there are opportunities in this pressure to streamline things that will benefit us long-term. Focus on what you *can* control, document your progress, and push back constructively if a specific task is truly impossible given current resources.