Join the discussion — anonymously
Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.
Comments (2)
I'm in a different division, but I'm hearing similar rumblings about increased workloads and a lack of backfilling positions. It feels like there's a general sense of being stretched thin across the board. The 'efficiency' talk definitely resonates – it seems to be the buzzword for handling more with fewer resources. Hopefully, it's a temporary phase and not a sign of deeper issues.
Yeah, that sentiment is definitely not isolated. In my experience, when key people start leaving and their work gets absorbed without new hires, it's a red flag. The 'efficiency' narrative often precedes significant restructuring or budget cuts. It's tough to stay motivated when you're constantly doing the work of two people. Keep an eye on how this plays out, especially with any upcoming earnings reports.