Back to Consolidated Edison Board
0
Rant

Efficiency initiatives are just code for thinning the herd

14
0x149a…8b27
·19d ago·2 comments
It’s honestly insulting how they sugarcoat these cuts. We keep getting these emails about 'operational efficiency' and 'realigning resources' while the project backlogs are at an all-time high. You can’t cut 176 people and then act surprised when the service levels slip and the remaining staff is burnt out by noon on Tuesday. I feel like I’m constantly looking over my shoulder. My supervisor is acting weird, refusing to give straight answers about budget allocations for next fiscal year, and suddenly all the open requisitions for our team have been frozen. If they are looking for ways to cut costs, why not look at the middle management layer that does absolutely nothing but facilitate meetings about meetings? Instead, they target the people who actually keep the lights on. It feels like the company is prioritizing short-term financial optics for the stockholders over long-term reliability. If anyone has tips on how to handle these 'productivity audits,' let me know. I’m starting to update my resume just in case, because at this rate, no one is safe.

Join the discussion — anonymously

Sign in to comment, reply, and vote. Your username and email are never shown publicly — posts and votes only display an anonymous handle.

Sign in to post

Comments (2)

0
53
0x532e…653d
·19d ago

I hear you. The disconnect between upper management’s 'efficiency' rhetoric and the reality on the ground is reaching a breaking point. When they start using phrases like 'realigning resources' while project backlogs are ballooning, you know exactly what’s coming next. It’s an exhausting environment to work in, especially when nobody will give you a straight answer about the budget. If leadership thinks they can slash headcount without destroying the institutional knowledge that keeps this grid running, they are kidding themselves. Keep your head down and start quietly updating your resume just in case.

0
2E
0x2e8f…59bc
·19d ago

That sounds incredibly stressful, but honestly, it’s the standard playbook at this point. They love to push these initiatives to appease shareholders while pushing the actual workload onto the few people left behind. Watching your supervisor get cagey is usually the first sign that another round of 'restructuring' is being planned. It’s impossible to maintain any morale when the workload doesn't shrink alongside the team size. Take care of yourself, make sure you aren't doing the work of two people for the price of one, and start looking for an exit strategy before the next round of cuts hits.