Consolidated Edison
EDSend this update
Consolidated Edison layoffs: 128 workers · WARN in GA · Oct 15, 2025
Latest WARN names 128 workers in GA.
People who work here
Verify a work email, then post with no name. A poll you start shows in the thread list. It stays open for 3 days unless you pick 1 or 7, and you can close it sooner. A private reply goes to Messages.
Loading…
People in this kind of work also look at
Ask someone who worked here
Ask for a reference, or what the job is really like. The reply goes to a private inbox. Your name stays off this page.
Loading…
Email me about Consolidated Edison
Sign up first. We email the address on that account when a new WARN filing or layoff report is linked to Consolidated Edison.
Checking account…Mail about more than this one employer is Premium: saved WARN searches and a weekly digest. Turn off or switch the employer email from your account.
Where to file if this is your employer
Latest WARN notice: Georgia, 128 workers, layoff date Oct 15, 2025.
Georgia unemployment is listed at up to $365 a week for 26 weeks. No waiting week is listed.
File in GeorgiaBenefit amounts are published estimates. Confirm the current rule with the state.
14.0K
$118.6
▼ 2.34%
None(0.2%)
announced Feb 14, 2025
9
announced Oct 15, 2025 · GA · 128 affected
Low
AI Layoff Impact Summary
AI-poweredConsolidated Edison announced layoffs on Feb 14, 2025, affecting 33 employees (0.2% of workforce). WARN filings indicate 9 active notices. Low risk — company appears stable.
All Posts
Everything in one feed
Efficiency initiatives are just code for thinning the herd
It’s honestly insulting how they sugarcoat these cuts. We keep getting these emails about 'operational efficiency' and 'realigning resources' while the project backlogs are at an all-time high. You can’t cut 176 people and then act surprised when the service levels slip and the remaining staff is burnt out by noon on Tuesday. I feel like I’m constantly looking over my shoulder. My supervisor is acting weird, refusing to give straight answers about budget allocations for next fiscal year, and suddenly all the open requisitions for our team have been frozen. If they are looking for ways to cut costs, why not look at the middle management layer that does absolutely nothing but facilitate meetings about meetings? Instead, they target the people who actually keep the lights on. It feels like the company is prioritizing short-term financial optics for the stockholders over long-term reliability. If anyone has tips on how to handle these 'productivity audits,' let me know. I’m starting to update my resume just in case, because at this rate, no one is safe.
Is the June 6th WARN notice just the tip of the iceberg?
So, we saw the filing for the 176 positions in New Jersey. Word on the street is that management is framing this as a regional realignment, but the morale in the office is absolutely cratering. I’ve been hearing whispers that this isn’t a one-time event and that leadership is planning to roll out similar 'streamlining' efforts across other divisions by Q3. I’ve been with ConEd for over a decade, and I’ve never seen the internal atmosphere this tense. People are spending more time refreshing the internal job board than actually doing their work. Does anyone have visibility on whether this is limited to the NJ infrastructure projects, or is the corporate side next on the chopping block? Every time a manager schedules a recurring meeting labeled 'Department Strategy Update,' everyone just assumes it's the start of the end. If you’re in one of these groups being hit, are they giving you any flexibility on notice periods, or are they walking people out the door immediately? Any insight would be appreciated by those of us still waiting for the other shoe to drop.
Impacted by the 176 - What now?
Just got the call today. It’s official. I’m part of the 176. Spent years grinding in grid ops only to get a 10-minute meeting with HR and a digital packet. I’m honestly shell-shocked. They kept talking about 'operational efficiency' and 'realigning priorities' during the whole town hall, and here I am thinking we were safe because of the work volume we handle. Joke's on me. To anyone still inside: watch your back. If they can drop this many people in a single day, nobody is safe regardless of tenure or performance ratings. For those of us on the way out, has anyone gotten clarification on the COBRA coverage yet? The paperwork they sent is intentionally vague regarding the subsidy duration. I’m trying to figure out if I need to start shopping for private plans immediately or if they’re actually going to bridge us for a bit. This is a mess.
Anyone else notice the sudden push for 'voluntary' separations?
Is it just me, or does it feel like the 176 cuts were just the appetizer? Ever since the news hit, my manager has been dropping heavy hints in our 1:1s about 'voluntary alignment programs.' They keep framing it as a way to avoid involuntary measures, but we all know the drill—they want the headcount reduction without the PR hit of more layoffs. I’ve been at Con Ed for over a decade, and the atmosphere has completely shifted. It used to be a place where you could build a career, but now it feels like every department is just waiting for the other shoe to drop. Has anyone actually seen a VSP offer yet, or are they just trying to gauge who is looking to leave before they start the next round of 'efficiency' cuts? The lack of transparency is killing morale. I’m starting to polish the resume tonight because sitting around waiting for my number to come up is taking a massive toll on my mental health.
Severance packages - what are people hearing?
With the 176 layoffs confirmed for June, has anyone actually seen the full severance terms yet? My department is rumored to be on the chopping block in the next wave, and I'm trying to figure out if I should just volunteer for a voluntary separation if they offer one. Is it standard weeks-per-year-of-service, or are they tightening the belt on that too? I’ve heard whispers that they might be offering less than the usual package to those affected by the 'strategic realignment' versus a standard reduction in force. Trying to get a sense of what the offer looks like so I can mentally prepare for the worst. If anyone has been through the paperwork or knows someone who got the email this morning, please drop a hint. Not looking for names, just a general idea of whether they're trying to push people out with pennies or if there's at least a decent runway to find something else. This whole process feels incredibly cold, even for this industry.
Anyone else getting the 'efficiency' email invites yet?
So the 176 number dropped today, but the vibe in the office is way worse than the actual count suggests. I’ve had two colleagues get pinged for 'quick syncs' with HR and their leads in the last three hours. Nobody is talking, everyone is just staring at their screens waiting for the ping. The official line is 'optimizing our workforce for future energy grid demands,' but we all know that’s just code for padding the numbers before the next quarterly review. I’ve been here long enough to know that when they start talking about synergy and grid modernization in the same breath as a head-count reduction, it’s not just the 176. It’s the start of the 'rolling' phase where they prune another few dozen every two weeks to keep the news cycles quiet. If you’re not looking at your LinkedIn right now, you’re making a mistake. I’ve already updated my resume and started reaching out to contacts at other utilities. ConEd isn't the stable sanctuary it used to be. Stay safe out there and start documenting everything before your access gets pulled.
Management is gaslighting us about 'resource optimization'
I’m so sick of the internal emails talking about 'optimizing our workforce.' We all know what that actually means. They spent all of Q1 talking about growth and infrastructure investment, and then drop a 176-person layoff notification like it’s just a routine administrative update. The irony of asking us to maintain 'unwavering commitment' to utility reliability while cutting the very people who actually keep the lights on is laughable. It’s impossible to plan a career here when you’re constantly looking over your shoulder to see if your department is next on the chopping block. Management isn't transparent, and the union reps seem just as in the dark as we are. How are you guys handling the morale hit? I’ve started updating my resume, but the market in the utility sector feels pretty stagnant right now. Just frustrated and needed to vent before another Monday morning all-hands meeting that won't answer a single real question.
Confirmed: 176 cuts just hit today. Is this the start of a trend?
Just saw the official notification hit the board regarding the 176 roles impacted as of today, June 6th. Honestly, it feels like the steady erosion we’ve been dreading since the start of the year. I know several folks in the affected departments, and the mood here is absolutely gutted. We keep hearing the ‘operational efficiency’ buzzwords from leadership, but it feels like they’re just stripping the skeleton of the company while the workload for those left behind continues to climb. Is there any indication that this is the final wave, or are we expecting another round of 'streamlining' in Q3? If you’re one of the 176, I’m truly sorry. Does anyone have info on severance packages or if they’re offering any outplacement support? It’s hard to stay focused on the grid when the floor feels like it's falling out from under us.
Anyone else feeling the pinch on new hires and internal transfers?
So, I've been keeping an eye on internal postings and also hearing from friends about external applications. It feels like the usual flow of new hires and internal transfers has really slowed to a crawl. I know a couple of departments that were actively looking to fill roles a few months back, and now those positions seem to be on indefinite hold or they're just not advertising new ones. It’s not just about specific jobs; it’s the overall vibe. Usually, you hear about people moving around, new faces joining teams, and it feels like that's just... stopped. It makes me wonder what's happening behind the scenes. Are they tightening the belt? Re-evaluating needs? Or is it something else entirely? It's hard to get a clear picture when there's no official word, and everyone's just kind of speculating. Anyone else in a similar boat or have any insights?
Unusual quiet in the grid operations department?
Hey everyone, I've been with Con Ed for a few years now, specifically in grid operations. Lately, it feels like things have gotten really quiet. Usually, this time of year, there's a lot of buzz about upcoming infrastructure upgrades, new pilot programs, and even the usual internal shuffle of resources. But lately, it's like a ghost town. My usual go-to channels for project updates are unusually silent, and even informal chats with colleagues in other departments aren't yielding much. Nobody seems to have concrete information on what's coming down the pipeline, which is frankly a little unsettling. Is anyone else in operations or a related field noticing this lull? Are there budget talks happening that we're not privy to? Just trying to gauge if this is a company-wide thing or if I'm just out of the loop. Feels weird, to be honest.
Is it just me, or are hiring freezes subtly creeping in?
Been trying to backfill a critical role in my team for months now, and it's been a nightmare. We've gone through multiple rounds of interviews, and every time, it feels like the goalposts shift. Either the budget gets pulled back, or HR suddenly tells us the "profile" has changed and we need to consider "internal candidates" who frankly aren't qualified. It's beyond frustrating. This isn't just a slow hiring season; it feels like a deliberate slowdown, almost like a soft hiring freeze is in effect without anyone officially announcing it. On top of that, any requests for new resources or even standard equipment upgrades are getting shot down with vague "budgetary constraints." It's making it incredibly difficult to get work done efficiently. Has anyone else encountered similar roadblocks when trying to bring in new talent or secure necessary resources? Curious if this is a wider trend across ConEd or if I'm just in a particularly challenging spot.
Anyone else notice the silence on upcoming projects?
Hey everyone, Been with ConEd for a few years now, and lately, things just feel... stagnant. Normally around this time of year, we'd be hearing whispers about new initiatives, project kick-offs, maybe even some internal reshuffling. But it's radio silence. Everyone's heads are down, just grinding through the day-to-day. You can feel a certain tension, like people are waiting for something, but nobody's sure what. Is it just my department, or is anyone else feeling this collective pause? Makes you wonder what's brewing behind the scenes, doesn't it? Trying not to jump to conclusions, but the lack of visibility is definitely unnerving. Just looking to see if others are picking up on the same vibe. Let me know what you're seeing (or not seeing!).
Is it just me, or are internal moves becoming impossible?
I've been trying to explore internal opportunities for a while now, and it feels like a brick wall. Not only are open positions scarce, but when they do pop up, the internal application process seems to be a black hole. HR says things are just "moving slower" but it feels more deliberate. People who normally would be open to discussing moves are suddenly very hesitant, even for lateral positions. It's creating a lot of frustration and a feeling of being stuck. Anyone else experiencing this, or have any tips on navigating the internal job market right now? Wondering if this is a sign of a broader hiring slowdown or if there's something else going on behind the scenes that's making internal mobility so difficult. I'm starting to think about looking outside, but really wanted to stay within ConEd if possible.
Anyone else feeling the budget squeeze at ConEd?
Been hearing a lot of whispers lately, but nothing concrete. Seems like discretionary spending is getting slashed, and a lot of non-essential projects are being put on hold or significantly scaled back. My team's been told to "prioritize ruthlessly" which is code for "do more with less." Has anyone else noticed this? Are there specific departments seeing more cuts than others? Trying to get a sense of whether this is a company-wide trend or just isolated incidents. Also, the usual holiday budgets seem to be nowhere in sight. Just curious what others are seeing on the ground. Is this a precursor to something bigger, or just a typical year-end budget shuffle?
Is anyone else seeing a shift in project priorities?
Lately, it feels like the projects we're working on are constantly changing direction, or priorities are being juggled every other week. We'll be deep into one initiative, and then suddenly a new 'urgent' task pops up, pushing the previous one to the back burner. It's making it hard to gain momentum and really deliver on anything substantial. I'm wondering if this is a symptom of something bigger going on, like a strategic rethink or perhaps resource constraints leading to reactive decision-making. It's definitely frustrating from a day-to-day perspective, and it makes planning ahead feel almost futile. Just curious if others are experiencing this same lack of consistent direction and what your thoughts are on why it might be happening.
What's going on with hiring freezes and internal transfers?
Hey everyone, been at Con Ed for a few years now, and it feels like things are getting weird. I've noticed a lot of internal job postings that seem to be going nowhere, and positions that used to open up quickly are now on hold. My team lead mentioned something about a hiring pause, but it wasn't super clear if it's company-wide or department-specific. It's making it tough for people looking to move around or even for managers trying to fill critical roles. Anyone else hearing similar things or experiencing this? Feels like there's a lot of quiet shuffling happening behind the scenes, and it's making me a bit uneasy about future opportunities. Trying to figure out if this is a temporary thing or the new normal. Any insights or experiences you can share would be helpful.
Is it just me or is the workload increasing without clear strategy?
Been at Con Ed for a while, and lately it feels like we're being asked to do more with less, but nobody's really explaining *why*. Projects are getting prioritized, then de-prioritized. Deadlines seem to shift, and there's a lot of pressure to meet them, but the underlying strategic rationale isn't always clear. It makes it hard to feel motivated when you're putting in the extra hours and aren't sure if it's truly contributing to the company's goals or just spinning wheels. I've heard some chatter about departments being 'streamlined' or 'optimized,' but again, zero concrete information. It feels like we're being set up for something, whether it's a major overhaul or just a reshuffling of priorities. Has anyone else noticed this trend, or am I just in a bubble with my team? Curious to hear if others are experiencing the same lack of strategic clarity and increased demands.
Anyone else feeling the uncertainty at Con Edison?
Hey everyone, been with Con Edison for a few years now in the [Department, e.g., Engineering] department. Lately, there's been a palpable sense of unease. No official word on anything, but the whispers about potential changes and efficiency drives are getting louder. Management is being pretty tight-lipped, which is honestly making things worse. You try to plan, you try to stay focused, but when you don't know what's coming, it's hard to give your all. I've seen a few colleagues looking a bit stressed, and frankly, so am I. Just wondering if anyone else is picking up on this vibe or has any insights they're willing to share, even if it's just anecdotal. Are there any department meetings coming up where this might be addressed? Or is it just the usual 'things are fine' song and dance? Trying to stay optimistic, but it's tough when the communication is this minimal.
Management silence on future direction is deafening
Seriously, what is going on at Con Ed? It feels like we're in a holding pattern, but nobody's telling us what we're holding for. The lack of communication from the top about the company's long-term strategy or any upcoming initiatives is getting pretty frustrating. We're out here doing the work, dealing with infrastructure, keeping the lights on, but there's zero visibility on where the company is headed. Are they planning major projects? Are there budget cuts coming down the pipeline? Or is this just the new normal of corporate silence? It makes it really hard to plan your own career, let alone feel motivated when you have no idea what the endgame is. It feels like we're expected to just keep pushing without any clear direction. Anyone else feeling this lack of transparency? It’s starting to wear thin, and frankly, it’s impacting morale.
Rumors of restructuring at Con Edison - anyone hearing anything?
Hey everyone, throwing this out there to see if anyone else is picking up on the same vibes. I've been at Con Ed for a few years now, and lately, it feels like there's a lot of quiet chatter about potential 'reorganizations' or 'efficiency drives.' No official word, obviously, but the whispers in the break room and the general quiet from management are starting to feel a bit… ominous. I've seen a couple of roles posted that seem a bit different than what we've had before, maybe consolidating responsibilities? Or just new initiatives? Hard to say. But with the current economic climate, it's hard not to connect the dots. Anyone in specific departments (Transmission & Distribution, Operations, IT) noticing anything unusual? Are there any more internal postings or communications that hint at changes? Just trying to gauge if it's just my department or a broader trend. Trying not to panic, but also want to be prepared. Any insights would be appreciated.
What's the deal with the hiring freeze at Con Ed?
Been trying to get a new position within Con Ed for a couple of months now. Applied to a bunch of internal postings and even had a couple of initial chats, but now it seems like everything has just stopped. The job board hasn't updated in weeks, and the recruiters I was in touch with are suddenly all 'overwhelmed' or 'postponing recruitment.' This feels like more than just standard seasonal slowdown. Anyone else in a similar boat? Is this a sign of things to come, or is it just a strategic pause? Trying to get a sense of what's really happening behind the scenes.
Anyone else feel the pressure at Con Ed lately?
Hey everyone, just wanted to see if I'm alone here or if others are feeling the same vibe at Con Ed. Been with the company for a few years now, and lately things just feel... different. More meetings, more pressure to hit metrics that seem a bit out of reach, and a general sense of uncertainty. I haven't heard any concrete rumors about layoffs, but the atmosphere is definitely tense. Projects are getting cut, and some departments seem to be consolidating or losing resources. Is this just the nature of the utility industry right now, or is something brewing specifically at Con Ed? Curious to hear what others are observing on the ground.
Thoughts on recent Con Ed management changes?
Saw a few senior folks shuffle around in the last quarter. Nothing major that's been announced company-wide, but within certain divisions, there have been some significant moves. Curious if this is part of a larger strategy or just the usual corporate musical chairs. I've been trying to read between the lines, but it's tough without more information. Does anyone have insight into what these changes might signal? Are we looking at a potential shift in priorities, or is it just business as usual with new faces? Trying to get a clearer picture of where things are headed, especially given the current economic climate. Any perspectives would be appreciated.
Quiet on the Western Front at Con Ed?
Been with Con Ed for a while now and things feel... weirdly quiet. Usually, there's some buzz about restructuring or departmental shifts, but lately, it's just been crickets. My team hasn't heard anything concrete, but there's this underlying tension that's hard to shake. Performance reviews just wrapped up, and while mine was fine, I've heard whispers about some teams getting less than stellar feedback. It's probably nothing, but that little voice in the back of your head starts wondering. Anyone else picking up on anything unusual, or am I just overthinking things? Feels like everyone's just heads-down waiting for something to happen, good or bad. Just trying to gauge the general sentiment out there.
Is now the time to polish the resume?
Okay, so this is more of a 'hypothetical' question, but honestly, it's weighing on my mind. We're all aware that the industry, even utilities, isn't immune to economic pressures. While there haven't been any official layoff announcements at Con Edison, the 'vibe' feels a bit off. I've noticed a few things: increased talk about efficiency, some reorganizations happening behind the scenes, and a general tightening of budgets on certain initiatives. It's not panic mode by any stretch, but it's enough to make me think about my own preparedness. For those who have been through layoffs before, either here or elsewhere, what are the subtle signs you look for? When does 'business as usual' start to feel like a precursor to something bigger? I'm not looking for gossip, but more for experienced perspectives on how to navigate these uncertain times. Should I be proactively updating my LinkedIn and resume, or is this just the standard cyclical nature of a large company? Looking forward to any insights you might have. Don't want to be caught off guard if things do shift.
Anyone else feeling the unease at Con Edison?
Hey all, posting anonymously because, well, you know how it is. I've been with Con Ed for a while now, and lately, there's just this low hum of anxiety in the air. No official word, no big announcements, but a lot of whispers and a general feeling of 'what's next?' Projects seem to be getting scrutinized more heavily, there's been some restructuring in a few departments, and just generally, the vibe isn't what it used to be. I'm seeing less of the long-term stability that used to be a hallmark of utility companies, especially here. It's making it hard to plan, both personally and professionally. Has anyone else picked up on this? Are there specific departments or roles that seem more affected or vulnerable? Just trying to get a sense of the broader landscape here. Trying not to jump to conclusions, but it's tough when the atmosphere feels so uncertain. Curious to hear if others are experiencing something similar or if I'm just overthinking things. Stay safe out there.
No more threads.